Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
m (Reverted edits by Flladmin (talk) to last revision by Alessandro) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== About this Wiki == | == About this Wiki == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 34: | ||
* [[Comments from Neil]] | * [[Comments from Neil]] | ||
* [[Comments from Calean]] | * [[Comments from Calean]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == TODO list == | ||
| + | {{Todo|Calean, could you please select a couple of benchmarks which feature the properties you mentioned, and add them to the Problems section, with a short motivation? --[[User:Flladmin|Fabien]] ([[User talk:Flladmin|talk]]) 17:49, 9 January 2017 (CET)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Todo|Neil, could you please paste in the problem definition from your paper in the [[TAMP Problem Definition]] section? --[[User:Flladmin|Fabien]] ([[User talk:Flladmin|talk]]) 18:05, 9 January 2017 (CET)}} | ||
== Contact == | == Contact == | ||
| − | If you want to join the discussion group, contact me at fabien[dot]lagriffoul[at]oru[dot]se | + | If you want to join the discussion group, create an account and contact me at fabien[dot]lagriffoul[at]oru[dot]se. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 16 January 2017
Contents
About this Wiki
Following the discussions at the TAMP workshop in RSS2016, a document was sketched for initiating thinking together about benchmarking for CTAMP planners. This wiki was created based on the previous document : we need more space to conduct proper discussions, and we may also have to share downloadable content later on. For now, the contents of the document were simply copy-pasted into different pages (sections Contents and Discussions below). Participants are invited to comment, correct, discuss, and bring their ideas.
Aims
My proposal is to start with a set of simple benchmark problems, which can be handled by the largest number of existing systems. This requires to identify the least common denominator, in terms of requirements and problem specification, at logical and geometric levels.
These requirements will be extended later on, but in order to reach a “critical mass” so that enough people start using these benchmarks and disseminate them through their publications, we need to begin with something simple and accessible.
How to edit this document
- The sections of the original document correspond to the different pages below (Contents and Discussions).
- In the Contents section, the comments have been pasted in the Discussion pages, in the form of discussion threads.
- If you think an important issue is overlooked, create a TODO item or reply to the thread (this should generate a New Message in each contributor's message box in the top-right menu).
- Note that there is an Atom feed for each discussion page (left menu) you can subscribe to for getting updated with new replies.
- If you think that an issue has been resolved, feel free to remove the thread / TODO and update the corresponding page.
- Syntax for signature: --~~~~
Contents
- Requirements (based on the article by Neil[1])
- General Assumptions
- Metrics
- Problems
- Practical Issues
- TAMP Problem Definition
Discussions
TODO list
TODO : Calean, could you please select a couple of benchmarks which feature the properties you mentioned, and add them to the Problems section, with a short motivation? --Fabien (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2017 (CET)
TODO : Neil, could you please paste in the problem definition from your paper in the TAMP Problem Definition section? --Fabien (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2017 (CET)
Contact
If you want to join the discussion group, create an account and contact me at fabien[dot]lagriffoul[at]oru[dot]se.
References
- ↑ Neil T. Dantam, Zachary K. Kingston, Swarat Chaudhuri, and Lydia E. Kavraki, Incremental Task and Motion Planning: A Constraint-Based Approach, (TAMP Workshop, RSS2016).
