Problems

From Tamp Benchmarking
Revision as of 18:51, 24 February 2018 by Flladmin (talk | contribs) (Problem 5 : Kitchen)
Jump to: navigation, search

Table summarizing some features we want to test. To be refined or extended.

Features Pb 1 Pb 2 Pb 3 Pb 4 Pb 5 Pb6 Discussed in
blocking objects X X bench. sugg. 3
large task spaces X X bench. sugg. 3, diff. pb. inst.
infeasible task operators x X bench. sugg. 3, diff. pb. inst.
trade-off motion planning/task planning X diff. pb. inst.
non-monotonicity X X bench. sugg. 4
NAMO  ? X X X Sidd. comment 4
Non-geometric actions X Sidd. comment 4


Problem 1 : Tower of Hanoi

problem 1 problem 1 problem 1

Description

Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots[1].

Challenge

For n discs, 2n - 1 moves are needed (in the non-geometric case).
Placing a disk on the central rod may prevent, depending on their relative sizes, to transfer discs from rod 1 to rod 3 (or vice versa).
The problem has been adapted to a humanoid robot setup. The idea is to have similar geometric constraints by setting the positions of the rods in a triangular shape and by using "thick" discs, in order to cause collisions between forearms and discs.

Download

Download page

Problem 2 : Blocks-World 3D

problem 2

Description

Using top-grasps only, and not using hand-over, stack the blocks in alphabetical order anywhere (on the table, or on one of the trays).
With a PR2 robot, the flying obstacle would be lower.

Challenge

Because of the "hovering obstacle", the pile cannot be built on the table.
Because of the "hovering obstacle", no more than 2 blocks can be stacked on the table (then the wrist touches the obstacle).
Whether the red or blue tray is chosen as location for building the pile, both initial piles need to be unstacked somewhere, somewhere reachable by both arms: R.
R is limited in size, and no more than 2 blocks can be stacked in this region, so there is a trade-off between:

  • a short symbolic plan with a cluttered R
  • a long symbolic plan with manageable R

Here is an example of solution.

Download

Download page

Problem 3 : Sorting Objects

problem 4

Description

The goal constraints are that all 7 blue blocks must be on the left table and all 7 green blocks must be on the right table. There are also 14 red blocks.

Challenge

The close proximity of the blocks forces the planner to carefully order its operations as well as to move red blocks out of the way.

Download

Download page

Problem 4 : Non-Monotonic

problem 5

Description

The robot must move the green blocks from the left table to a corresponding position on the right table. Both the initial and goal poses are blocked by four blue and cyan blocks respectively.

Challenge

Critically, the blue and cyan blocks have goal conditions to remain in their initial poses. This is the source of the nonmonotonicity as the robot must undo several goals by moving the blue and cyan blocks in order to solve the problem.

Download

Download page

Problem 5 : Kitchen

problem 5

Description

The robot must prepare a meal by cleaning two glasses (blue blocks), cooking two cabbages (green blocks), and setting the table. Objects can be cleaned when placed on the dishwasher and cooked when placed on the microwave. An object must be cleaned before it can be cooked. Finally, the radishes (pink blocks) initially obstruct the cabbages on the shelf forcing the robot to move them. But, to maintain a tidy kitchen, the robot must also return them to their initial poses.

Challenge

This benchmark demonstrates that these challenges do appear in target applications. It combines several criteria including blocking objects, non-monotonicity, and non-geometric actions (cleaning and cooking).

Download

Download page

Problem 6 : Rearrangement Planning (replaced by problem 3)

problem 3

Description

The goal is to exchange the positions (i.e., the centre of objects) of the red object and the tray.

Challenge

One of the two objects has to be moved first to a temporary location. This may require to move other objects around, carefully choosing places that do not interfere.

The rearrangement planning problem [2] [3].

References

  1. S. Cambon, R. Alami, and F. Gravot. A hybrid approach to intricate motion, manipulation and task planning. The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 2009.
  2. G. Havur et al., Geometric rearrangement of multiple movable objects on cluttered surfaces: A hybrid reasoning approach, Proceedings of ICRA 2014.
  3. F. Lagriffoul, B. Andres, Combining Task and Motion Planning: a culprit detection problem, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016.