Difference between revisions of "Problems"
From Tamp Benchmarking
(Created page with "I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in <ref>Fabien Lagriffoul. ''On Benchmarks for C...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in <ref>Fabien Lagriffoul. ''On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning.'' TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.</ref>. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed]. | I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in <ref>Fabien Lagriffoul. ''On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning.'' TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.</ref>. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed]. | ||
| + | [[File:bm1.jpg|100px|caption1]] | ||
Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup. | Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 19:17, 8 January 2017
I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in [1]. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].
Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup.
References
- ↑ Fabien Lagriffoul. On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning. TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.
