Difference between revisions of "Problems"
From Tamp Benchmarking
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[File:bm1.jpg|problem 1|300px]] | [[File:bm1.jpg|problem 1|300px]] | ||
| − | Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots. Work in progress: converting this problem to a humanoid robot setup. | + | Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots<ref>S. Cambon, R. Alami, and F. Gravot. A hybrid approach to intricate motion, manipulation and task planning. The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 2009.</ref>. Work in progress: converting this problem to a humanoid robot setup. |
== Blocks-World 3D == | == Blocks-World 3D == | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 10 January 2017
I propose two problems (Tower of Hanoi and Blocks-World 3D), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in [1]. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].
Added the rearrangement planning problem following the discussion
Tower of Hanoi
Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots[2]. Work in progress: converting this problem to a humanoid robot setup.
Blocks-World 3D
Blocks-World 3D with geometric constraint on the (mandatory) intermediate location.
Rearrangement planning
The rearrangement planning problem [3] [4].
References
- ↑ Fabien Lagriffoul. On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning. TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.
- ↑ S. Cambon, R. Alami, and F. Gravot. A hybrid approach to intricate motion, manipulation and task planning. The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 2009.
- ↑ G. Havur et al., Geometric rearrangement of multiple movable objects on cluttered surfaces: A hybrid reasoning approach, Proceedings of ICRA 2014.
- ↑ F. Lagriffoul, B. Andres, Combining Task and Motion Planning: a culprit detection problem, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016.
