Difference between revisions of "Problems"

From Tamp Benchmarking
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in <ref>Fabien Lagriffoul. ''On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning.'' TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.</ref>. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].
+
I propose two problems (Tower of Hanoi and Blocks-World 3D), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in <ref>Fabien Lagriffoul. ''On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning.'' TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.</ref>. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].
  
[[File:bm1.jpg|problem 1|300px]] [[File:bm2.jpg|problem 2|300px]]
+
Added the rearrangement planning problem following the discussion
  
 +
== Tower of Hanoi ==
 +
[[File:bm1.jpg|problem 1|300px]]
  
Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup.
+
Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots. Work in progress: converting this problem to a humanoid robot setup.
 +
 
 +
== Blocks-World 3D ==
 +
[[File:bm2.jpg|problem 2|300px]]
 +
 
 +
Blocks-World 3D with geometric constraint on the (mandatory) intermediate location.
 +
 
 +
== Rearrangement planning ==
 +
[[File:bm3.jpg|problem 3|400px]]
 +
 
 +
The rearrangement planning problem
 +
<ref>G. Havur et al., ''Geometric rearrangement of multiple movable objects on cluttered surfaces: A hybrid reasoning approach'', Proceedings of ICRA 2014.</ref>
 +
<ref>F. Lagriffoul, B. Andres, ''Combining Task and Motion Planning: a culprit detection problem'', The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016.</ref>.
  
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 13:46, 10 January 2017

I propose two problems (Tower of Hanoi and Blocks-World 3D), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in [1]. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].

Added the rearrangement planning problem following the discussion

Tower of Hanoi

problem 1

Tower of Hanoi with mobile robots. Work in progress: converting this problem to a humanoid robot setup.

Blocks-World 3D

problem 2

Blocks-World 3D with geometric constraint on the (mandatory) intermediate location.

Rearrangement planning

problem 3

The rearrangement planning problem [2] [3].


References

  1. Fabien Lagriffoul. On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning. TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.
  2. G. Havur et al., Geometric rearrangement of multiple movable objects on cluttered surfaces: A hybrid reasoning approach, Proceedings of ICRA 2014.
  3. F. Lagriffoul, B. Andres, Combining Task and Motion Planning: a culprit detection problem, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016.