Difference between revisions of "Problems"
From Tamp Benchmarking
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup. | Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup. | ||
| − | {{Todo|Calean, could you please select a couple of benchmarks which feature the properties you mentioned, and add them to the Problems section, with a short motivation?}} | + | |
| + | {{Todo|Calean, could you please select a couple of benchmarks which feature the properties you mentioned, and add them to the Problems section, with a short motivation? --[[User:Flladmin|Fabien]] ([[User talk:Flladmin|talk]]) 17:47, 9 January 2017 (CET)}} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 9 January 2017
I propose two problems (and wait for other proposals), which respect the requirements discussed above, and which are described in [1]. I find these problems interesting due to the strong dependencies between logical and geometric level, plus the fact that they can be scaled up [to be completed].
Work in progress: migration to the PR2 platform, converting problem 11 to a humanoid robot setup.
TODO : Calean, could you please select a couple of benchmarks which feature the properties you mentioned, and add them to the Problems section, with a short motivation? --Fabien (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2017 (CET)
References
- ↑ Fabien Lagriffoul. On Benchmarks for Combined Task and Motion Planning. TAMP Workshop, RSS 2016.
